Skip to content
Comparison

n8n vs Make (Integromat): Which Is Better in 2026?

n8n vs Make compared on pricing, flexibility, self-hosting, and ease of use to help you choose the right visual automation platform.

Lokesh Kapoor Jan 16, 2026 1 min read

Some links on n8n.school are affiliate links. If you sign up or purchase through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend tools we genuinely believe help you automate better.

Quick verdict

Choose n8n if you want self-hosting, deep flexibility, and strong AI capabilities. Choose Make for a polished visual builder and a gentle on-ramp with generous operation-based pricing.

Try n8n

At-a-glance comparison

Featuren8nMake
Pricing modelFree self-host / paid cloudOperation-based tiers
Self-hosting
Visual builderNode canvasPolished scenario canvas
FlexibilityVery highHigh
AI workflowsExcellentGood
Data controlFull (self-host)On Make's cloud

Best for

n8n

  • Self-hosting and data control
  • Complex and AI-heavy workflows
  • Cost control at scale

Make

  • Users who love a visual canvas
  • Mid-complexity automations
  • Teams wanting a smooth UX

n8n and Make (formerly Integromat) are both excellent visual automation tools. The decision often comes down to self-hosting and how complex your workflows get.

The quick answer

  • Pick n8n for self-hosting, flexibility, and AI workflows.
  • Pick Make for a beautifully polished visual builder and an easy on-ramp.

Visual builder

Make is famous for its slick scenario canvas — it's a joy to use. n8n's node canvas is also clear and powerful, with a more developer-leaning feel.

Recommended

Prefer flexibility and self-hosting?

n8n runs on your own server and scales with your ambitions.

Try n8n

Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Pricing

Make uses operation-based pricing that's generous at lower volumes. n8n can be self-hosted for just server costs, making it very economical at scale.

Flexibility and AI

Both are flexible, but n8n's HTTP and code nodes plus its built-in AI tooling give it an edge for complex and AI-heavy automations.

Choosing between n8n and Make?

Book a 1:1 n8n clarity call and get your workflow reviewed by a practitioner.

Get a recommendation

Final recommendation

Want self-hosting, deep flexibility, and AI? Go n8n. Want the smoothest visual experience for mid-complexity automations? Make is a great pick. Need help deciding? Book a clarity call.

n8n: pros & cons

Pros

  • Self-hosting available
  • Extremely flexible with HTTP + code
  • Strong AI tooling

Cons

  • Slightly steeper learning curve
  • Self-hosting needs upkeep

Make: pros & cons

Pros

  • Beautiful, intuitive visual builder
  • Generous operations on lower tiers
  • Large app library

Cons

  • No self-hosting
  • Can get costly at high volume

Frequently asked questions

Is n8n or Make better for beginners?
Make's visual builder is very approachable, but n8n is also beginner-friendly for basic workflows. Make edges ahead on first-time polish; n8n wins on long-term flexibility.
Does Make support self-hosting?
No. Make is cloud-only. If self-hosting matters to you for cost or data control, n8n is the clear choice.
Which is cheaper, n8n or Make?
Self-hosted n8n is typically the cheapest at scale since you only pay for a server. Make's operation-based pricing is competitive at lower volumes.
L

Written by

Lokesh Kapoor

Web developer, automation creator & n8n practitioner

I help creators, founders, agencies, and businesses automate smarter with n8n — from their first workflow to production-grade automation systems.